Re: Problems with bitmasks and 64 bit values

[Thomas Wiens <th.wiens () gmx de>]

On 31.10.2016 11:53, Thomas Wiens wrote:
> On 31.10.2016 08:10, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>
> > Because we overlooked this. I intended to change it today but Guy was
> > faster than me. Nightly master-2.0, master-2.2 and master builds should
> > behave properly. If you need to use a stable released version, then you
> > need to create the tree and sub elements yourself as I suggested yesterday.
>
> There's still an issue when adding the text to the main proto item,
> where the value is always casted to guint32.
> I think all from INT8 to INT32 should be casted to gint32, and all from
> UINT8 to UINT32 to guint32.
> Also 64 bit values are casted down to 32 bit, I think it'll need a
> little bit more (special?) handling of 64 bit values / 64bit value strings?

If there is no one already working on, I'll try if I can fix it and
apply a patch, if this is Ok.

-- 
Thomas

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe