Re: Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0

[Oscar Moreno <omoreno () gmail com>]

Thanks for your email Graham. I would like to be able to run Wireshark from
a USB pen drive, so I don't need to ido any installacion. When
troubleshooting performance/security issues, sometimes we won't be able to
install anything into the computer. However, I just realized that even
running Wireshark portable version, you will still need to have either
winPcap or win10Pcap installed on the computer. It looks it won be a way to
be ruining it from a USB flash drive without installing either WinPcap or
Win10Pcap in the computer.

Regards,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <wireshark-users-request () wireshark org>
wrote:

> Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
>         wireshark-users () wireshark org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         wireshark-users-owner () wireshark org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0 (Oscar Moreno)
>    2. Re: Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0 (Graham Bloice)
>    3. Wiresharktraining.com (Ralph Gay)
>    4. Re: Wiresharktraining.com (Saulpaugh, Chris)
>    5. Re: Wiresharktraining.com (Ralph Gay)
>    6. Re: Wiresharktraining.com (Saulpaugh, Chris)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:28:49 +0200
> From: Oscar Moreno <omoreno () gmail com>
> To: wireshark-users () wireshark org
> Subject: [Wireshark-users] Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0
> Message-ID:
>         <CAPdJ-AWFsQ8MgmRamAU36B90DvWm03d0YBG
> z95n6Ww1YBq+5Aw () mail gmail com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello,
>
> I have just installed wireshark portable 2.2.0 in my USB and Win10Pcap into
> my windows 10 laptop. I am now having issues with my external mouse and I
> don't know if it may be related with the Win10Pcan installation. To be
> honest, I was hesitant about installing Win10Pcap, but I am not yet 100%
> sure that the current version of winpcap will work fine on Windows 10.
> Please advice.
>
> Thanks,
> Oscar
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <wireshark-users-request () wireshark org>
> wrote:
>
> > Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
> >         wireshark-users () wireshark org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >         https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >         wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >         wireshark-users-owner () wireshark org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. What does ?Raw packet data? field mean in Wireshark? (??)
> >    2. Re: What does ?Raw packet data? field mean in Wireshark?
> >       (Jaap Keuter)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:06:51 +0800
> > From: ?? <jie.jiang () tongdun cn>
> > To: wireshark-users () wireshark org
> > Subject: [Wireshark-users] What does ?Raw packet data? field mean in
> >         Wireshark?
> > Message-ID: <8AA0A600-51FB-4256-99BA-4F1F58B9B0CC () tongdun cn>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> >
> >
> > As you can see in first figure, what does that Raw packet data mean? What
> > is the difference between normal tcp packet in figure 2?
> >
> > FYI, I'm using Wireshark 2.2.0.
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> > attachments/20160918/b9498b3f/attachment.html>
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: ???? 2016-09-13 ??8.52.23.png
> > Type: image/png
> > Size: 23833 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> > attachments/20160918/b9498b3f/attachment.png>
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: ???? 2016-09-13 ??8.53.04.png
> > Type: image/png
> > Size: 25088 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> > attachments/20160918/b9498b3f/attachment-0001.png>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:41:43 -0500
> > From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
> > To: Community support list for Wireshark
> >         <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] What does ?Raw packet data? field mean
> >         in Wireshark?
> > Message-ID: <1EF6294B-4945-4D86-A291-5D17A797F02B () xs4all nl>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The ?Raw packet data' means that there?s no link layer information
> > available, just upper (in this can network) layer information.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jaap
> >
> > > On 17 Sep 2016, at 22:06, ?? <jie.jiang () tongdun cn> wrote:
> > >
> > > <???? 2016-09-13 ??8.52.23.png>
> > >
> > > <???? 2016-09-13 ??8.53.04.png>
> > >
> > > As you can see in first figure, what does that Raw packet data mean?
> > What is the difference between normal tcp packet in figure 2?
> > > FYI, I'm using Wireshark 2.2.0.
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________
> > _______________
> > > Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <
> wireshark-users () wireshark org
> > > Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> > > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
> > >             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=
> > unsubscribe
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users () wireshark org
> > https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> >
> > End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 124, Issue 7
> > ***********************************************
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160921/f4aed861/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:35:01 +0100
> From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
>         <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Win10Pcap and Wireshark portable 2.2.0
> Message-ID:
>         <CALcKHKpV0+piJDu7N1+fq4jQTs7NsfrKxq_
> 3VGaFJAC9duDbqQ () mail gmail com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 21 September 2016 at 13:28, Oscar Moreno <omoreno () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have just installed wireshark portable 2.2.0 in my USB and Win10Pcap
> > into my windows 10 laptop. I am now having issues with my external mouse
> > and I don't know if it may be related with the Win10Pcan installation. To
> > be honest, I was hesitant about installing Win10Pcap, but I am not yet
> 100%
> > sure that the current version of winpcap will work fine on Windows 10.
> > Please advice.
> Win10Pcap is a separate project that is not supported by Wireshark or
> WinPcap.  You'll have to contact the Win10Pcap project for support
> directly.
>
> The current WinPcap 4.1.3 version runs happily on Windows 10.
>
> Why are you using the portable version of Wireshark if you require capture
> capabilities, why not just install the regular version which will offer to
> install WinPcap for you if required?
>
> --
> Graham Bloice
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160921/ca21a0ce/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:04:16 -0400
> From: Ralph Gay <rjgay33 () gmail com>
> To: Community <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
> Message-ID:
>         <CACOap5bbsMut6zDMOuHxiZ_U19ePHies5Xxg+qHMcaZYyioJuQ@
> mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others
> having the same issue?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160921/a87fb7b0/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:16:41 +0000
> From: "Saulpaugh, Chris" <Chris.Saulpaugh () sdsheriff org>
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
>         <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
> Message-ID:
>         <BD7D4189F0389C4D90D84815A8EF7C503D456536 () MXMBCOC01 sdsheriff com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Working fine here. Just tried?
>
> Is your DNS having an issue?
>
> From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-
> bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Ralph Gay
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:15 AM
> To: Community <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
>
> For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others
> having the same issue?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160921/9d45093d/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:14:34 -0400
> From: Ralph Gay <rjgay33 () gmail com>
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
>         <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
> Message-ID:
>         <CACOap5ZcfdpuuWj3i1Cqgq+G3ep2ngbYsyrmh6sU5wjp+ASWYQ@
> mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks for the reply. DNS resolves OK but something in our corporate
> network is blocking the site. I just tried cellular and got there fine.
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Saulpaugh, Chris <
> Chris.Saulpaugh () sdsheriff org> wrote:
>
> > Working fine here. Just tried?
> >
> >
> >
> > Is your DNS having an issue?
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-
> > bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Ralph Gay
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:15 AM
> > *To:* Community <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> > *Subject:* [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
> >
> >
> >
> > For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others
> > having the same issue?
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > _______________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org
> >
> > Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
> >              mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=
> > unsubscribe
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160921/e5a6d519/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:18:00 +0000
> From: "Saulpaugh, Chris" <Chris.Saulpaugh () sdsheriff org>
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
>         <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
> Message-ID:
>         <BD7D4189F0389C4D90D84815A8EF7C503D456C3C () MXMBCOC01 sdsheriff com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Gotta love those web proxy/filtering tools!
>
> Your Web Security Team may need to setup a proxy exception to the site
> once they feel it has been properly vetted for security.
>
> Cheers,
>
> From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-
> bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Ralph Gay
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:15 AM
> To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
>
> Thanks for the reply. DNS resolves OK but something in our corporate
> network is blocking the site. I just tried cellular and got there fine.
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Saulpaugh, Chris <
> Chris.Saulpaugh () sdsheriff org<mailto:Chris.Saulpaugh () sdsheriff org>>
> wrote:
> Working fine here. Just tried?
>
> Is your DNS having an issue?
>
> From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark
> -users-bounces () wireshark org> [mailto:wireshark-users-
> bounces () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org>] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Gay
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:15 AM
> To: Community <wireshark-users () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-users@
> wireshark.org>>
> Subject: [Wireshark-users] Wiresharktraining.com
>
> For several days I have been unable to access the web site. Are others
> having the same issue?
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org
> <mailto:wireshark-users () wireshark org>>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>              mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org<mailto:w
> ireshark-users-request () wireshark org>?subject=unsubscribe
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/
> attachments/20160921/bf04955c/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users () wireshark org
> https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
> End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 124, Issue 8
> ***********************************************
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe