Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: epan_t and capture_file
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:13:08 -0700
On Apr 14, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Simon Barber <simon.barber () meraki net> wrote:
The timeline needs to know whether every packet includes timing information. If not, the timeline should be hidden. This is only determined after all the packets have been through a first dissection pass.
Then there needs to be a mechanism by which the timeline GUI code can inquire whether every packet includes timing information. The change to allow dissectors to share per-capture data (not "private" data, "private" means you *don't* share it, as per Michael Mann's comment) would be a mechanism to do that. For now, just change "private" to "per_capture" in the function and variable/field names and to "per-capture" elsewhere, and wait for it to be approved. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- epan_t and capture_file Simon Barber (Apr 13)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Guy Harris (Apr 13)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Simon Barber (Apr 13)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Guy Harris (Apr 13)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Simon Barber (Apr 14)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Guy Harris (Apr 14)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Guy Harris (Apr 14)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Michael Mann (Apr 14)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Guy Harris (Apr 14)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Michael Mann (Apr 14)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Simon Barber (Apr 13)
- Re: epan_t and capture_file Guy Harris (Apr 13)