Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Kasumi algorithm implementation


From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:33:50 +0100

Le 28 févr. 2017 01:55, "Joerg Mayer" <jmayer () loplof de> a écrit :

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12:00PM +0100, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Nothing has changed since that time (except the fact that the link is
http://www.3gpp.org/specifications/60-confidentiality-algorithms).
As you said this was raised in the past so far not integrated to avoid
being potentially sued (like for AMR codecs, SNOW3G and ZUC ciphers,...).
None of us has paid a lawyer to verify whether we could safely add it or
not.

What has changed is, that there seems to be a useable (from a copyright
point
of view) source code implementation available where it wasn't before.

I still think that a pure source implementation is unproblematic. But out
of curiosity: Is there a link to the patent, so we may have a look?


A simple search on Google gives several links. Feel free to check whether
you think they are applicable or not.

Regards,
Pascal.


Thanks
  Jörg

--
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: