Re: Building CORBA dissectors

[Michael Mann <mmann78 () netscape net>]

I'm guessing you didn't get a response because no one is building CORBA dissectors outside of the 3 or 4 that are in 
the source tree.  Those are generated with idl2wrs, but then the C output is part of source control (partially because 
I'm not sure all platforms could generate the C dissector as part of the build process).
If the CORBA dissectors that are currently in Wireshark source don't generate correctly, I can certainly take a look.  
But if you have "private" CORBA dissectors, we may need to chat offline if you can't share them publically.  Otherwise 
the preferred solution would be to provide your CORBA dissector (and sample capture) in a bug report in Bugzilla.

Michael
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: David Hagood <david.hagood () gmail com>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Mon, Jun 26, 2017 7:23 am
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Building CORBA dissectors

I've asked about this before, but gotten no responses:Has anybody tried to build a CORBA dissector from IDL with the 
current git head? It seems the idl2wrs program has been changed, and it no longer seems to be able to process IDL 
correctly.___________________________________________________________________________Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing 
list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-devUnsubscribe: 
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark 
org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe