Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: OSX build fails
From: Eliot Lear <lear () ofcourseimright com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:23:02 +0100
Wait a sec: On 11/22/17 1:06 PM, João Valverde wrote:
If you are installing Wireshark dependencies from binary repositories you should be installing Wireshark from a binary package too. If your vendor does not provide one complain to them.
This seems to me extreme. It also seems to me that you are essentially asking for a change in distribution with regard to Qt, which is the only component (at least for the Mac) that is distributed in binary format. Moreover, some of us really don't care that much about having the source, and just want to add or amend dissectors, or the like. And so coming back to the earlier discussion, I thought the original poster was asking something rather simple, which was this: if people aren't using autoconf, then perhaps the dist needs some cleaning up. I have no view on this since I don't use wireshark on linux, but others might. Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: OSX build fails, (continued)
- Re: OSX build fails Guy Harris (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Roland Knall (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Roland Knall (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails Anders Broman (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 22)
- Re: OSX build fails João Valverde (Nov 24)
- Re: OSX build fails Eliot Lear (Nov 22)