Re: SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>]

Hi,

Maybe start off by checking other files, eg.the documentation files first. The dissectors are the easy targets.

Thanks,,
Jaap

> On 10 Nov 2017, at 10:44, Darien Spencer <cusneud () mail com> wrote:
>
> Since this patch was merged, should we start replacing (manually or automaticly) the license info in other files such 
> as dissectors?
>  
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 at 6:09 PM
> From: "Gerald Combs" <gerald () wireshark org>
> To: "Developer support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs
> Earlier today I gave a short talk about navigating Wireshark's source code. One thing I mentioned is that we have 
> quite a bit of boilerplate at the top and bottom of most files, and in the past this has confused git when copying 
> and renaming files (for me, at least).
>
> I've uploaded a change at https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/24302/ <https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/24302/> 
> which starts the process of replacing the GPLv2-or-later blurb at the top of various files with 
> "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+". Is there any reason we shouldn't go ahead with this?

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe