Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Qt column sorting?


From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:29:51 +0100

The proxy model should work, but leads to other issues, because of the way
we store the data. But it is definitely the way going forward, but as
mentioned, I would wait for 3.0, as it could mean (not necessarily, but I
would not bet against it) that the underlying model either has to learn
things or needs to forget things.

Sorting btw could be easier, but filtering needs the display filter model
to be incorporated and this seems to be the main issue

cheers
Roland

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

On Feb 14, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:

Not at the current data model. We store and sort in epan, not in Qt. The
later would allow to sort without epan knowing, currently, that is not how
it is implemented.

I think this could be changed, would wait for 2.6 or 3.0 though

For example, using a proxy model, as per

        https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201506/msg00088.html
____________________________________________________________
_______________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: