Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Philosophy question - avoiding g_alloc in dissectors?
From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:11:46 +0100
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Craig Jackson <cejackson51 () gmail com> wrote:
I'm thinking that (3) is the best, but I want confirmation from the more experienced developers. Also, if I create wmwm_strjoin, should I fix packet-rtps.c? I would have to way to test it unless there is an archive of rtps captures.
I'd go with (3) and fix packet-rtps.c as well.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Philosophy question - avoiding g_alloc in dissectors? Craig Jackson (Jan 30)
- Re: Philosophy question - avoiding g_alloc in dissectors? Dario Lombardo (Jan 31)