Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Philosophy question - avoiding g_alloc in dissectors?


From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:11:46 +0100

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Craig Jackson <cejackson51 () gmail com>
wrote:

I'm thinking that (3) is the best, but I want confirmation from the more
experienced developers. Also, if I create wmwm_strjoin, should I fix
packet-rtps.c? I would have to way to test it unless there is an archive of
rtps captures.


I'd go with (3) and fix packet-rtps.c as well.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: