Re: Subtree expand/collapse tracking

[Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>]

Could you create a bug entry for this, including an example trace, with which we could demonstrate this behavior ?

Cheers
Roland

> Am 13.01.2018 um 01:24 schrieb Thomas Wiens <th.wiens () gmx de>:
>
> Hi,
> when I build Wireshark from the current git repository, I get a
> different behaviour in tracking expanded/collapsed subtrees compared to
> the latest stable 2.4.4.
>
> In 2.4.4 if I have expanded a 2nd level (or deeper) subtree element like
> tcp.flags and then selected another packet, then also the tree was
> expanded to this level.
> I thought the intention of the ett_ variables are to keep track of which
> subtrees are expanded.
>
> With my compiled version from the git repository, the expanded nodes are
> only tracked on the root node. In tcp for example, if I expand the tcp
> tree then all other tcp root nodes are expanded in all other packets I
> select.
> All subtree elements are closed, but now always. And it does not seem
> like random when an expanded subtree element is tracked.
>
> Is this an intented "new behaviour" or a bug?
>
> System: Windows 7, 32 Bit
>
> -- 
> Thomas
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe