Re: Retrieving dissection result from another dissector

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Jul 3, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com> wrote:

> As the scope is an explicit argument, I find it quite clear what's going on already.

As the two functions are quite different in intent, I find it not entirely clear, merely from the scope, what's going 
on.

> Personally I do not think a new function is required (the add/get/remove being what they mean), and they are here 
> since a long time so it would change existing habits.

I'd like to change habits so that people think of "persistent per-packet data" and "per-dissection data" very 
differently.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe