Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Lua update?
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 21:29:38 +0200
It was always planned on moving to Lua 5.3 at least. But also the library API changed which is some work still left over Am Do., 12. Juli 2018 um 21:14 Uhr schrieb Maynard, Chris < Christopher.Maynard () igt com>:
Release notes for 5.3: http://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/readme.html It’s possible that there are incompatibilities, which would necessitate modifying Lua scripts , but for me personally, I don’t mind changing my scripts if I have to. In fact, I **want** to change my scripts in order to make use of some new features, in particular the bitwise operators[1]. To me, the perfect time to update would be for the next Wireshark 3.0 release. Previous discussion starts here: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201608/msg00082.html. Maybe João, Pascal, Peter, Hadriel and others would like to weigh in again here? - Chris *From:* Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Pascal Quantin *Sent:* Thursday, July 12, 2018 2:46 PM *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lua update? Le jeu. 12 juil. 2018 à 20:44, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com> a écrit : Hi Chris, Le jeu. 12 juil. 2018 à 20:30, Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard () igt com> a écrit : Is there any particular reason why Wireshark for Windows still ships with Lua 5.2.4? An upgrade to 5.3+ would be a welcome one. Thanks. Can our current code run fine with Lua 5.3/5.4? Based on previous discussions in -dev I thought it was not the case but maybe I'm wrong (I'm not a Lua user myself and this is based on exchanges from a few years ago). If it is safe, I will happily update the package. And would the existing scripts be compatible with Lua 5.3 or 5.4? Pascal. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary, confidential or trade secret information. This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Lua update? Maynard, Chris (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? Pascal Quantin (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? Pascal Quantin (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? Alexis La Goutte (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? Maynard, Chris (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? Roland Knall (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? Peter Wu (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? João Valverde (Jul 14)
- Re: Lua update? João Valverde (Jul 13)
- Re: Lua update? Pascal Quantin (Jul 12)
- Re: Lua update? Pascal Quantin (Jul 12)