Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: How code recognizes that processing of all packets with tap was finished?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:45:48 -0700
On Jun 20, 2018, at 3:14 PM, Jirka Novak <j.novak () netsystem cz> wrote:
What is correct way to recognize that capture processing with tap was finished?
There isn't one, unfortunately. We'd have to change the tap mechanism to introduce a "we're done processing packets" callback to provide that. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- How code recognizes that processing of all packets with tap was finished? Jirka Novak (Jun 20)
- Re: How code recognizes that processing of all packets with tap was finished? Guy Harris (Jun 21)
- Re: How code recognizes that processing of all packets with tap was finished? Jirka Novak (Jun 21)
- Re: How code recognizes that processing of all packets with tap was finished? Guy Harris (Jun 21)
- Re: How code recognizes that processing of all packets with tap was finished? Jirka Novak (Jun 21)
- Re: How code recognizes that processing of all packets with tap was finished? Guy Harris (Jun 21)