Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:43:29 -0700
On Jun 27, 2018, at 5:47 PM, David Mirabito <davidm () metamako com> wrote:
In my playpen right now, it's in 2^-24th's of a ns,
At least it's bigger than this: https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-measure-the-smallest-fragment-of-time-ever-witness-an-electron-escaping-an-atom ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Sub-nanosecond timestamps David Mirabito (Jun 27)
- Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)
- Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps David Mirabito (Jun 27)
- Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps Guy Harris (Jun 27)
- Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps David Mirabito (Jun 27)
- Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps Guy Harris (Jun 28)
- Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps David Mirabito (Jun 28)
- Re: Sub-nanosecond timestamps Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)