Re: Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector?

[Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl>]

Hi Antoine!

Based on the specifications for Syncthing, it appears that it uses Protobuf for defining its messages:
https://docs.syncthing.net/specs/

I am not sure how well protobuf is currently supported on Wireshark, you could scan the issue tracker and code review 
site to see if there is any current work in that area.

Kind regards,
Peter
https://lekensteyn.nl
(pardon my brevity, top-posting and formatting, sent from my phone)


On November 8, 2018 9:32:50 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine d'Otreppe <a.dotreppe () aspyct org> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm interested in learning more about wireshark in general, and in
> particular learning how to make my own dissectors.
>
> I just happened to find a protocol that doesn't seem to have any
> dissector for it yet: syncthing. https://syncthing.net/
> The local discovery protocol looks easy enough to begin with, as it is
> only UDP broadcasts.
>
> Your developer guide recommends to send a mail before starting
> development to check if anyone else would be working on a similar
> topic. That sounds reasonable :)
>
> Anybody working on that protocol yet?
>
> Regards,
> Antoine d'Otreppe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe