Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Adding a new packet to Wireshark


From: Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 21:54:04 +0100

I can't see any blocker in what you're proposing. Feel free to push your
proposals and follow the review process.
Thanks for the contribution.

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 9:50 PM Bruni, Michelle <Michelle.Bruni () spirent com>
wrote:

Hello,

I am Michelle and I work at Spirent Communications. We have been building
Wireshark for many years because we had a proprietary signature field that
we needed to decode and give to our customers. We are looking to open
source our signature field and would like to put our packet dissectors into
the Wireshark codebase. Before we get started on going through the process
of committing and reviewing the changes into Wireshark I wanted to find out
if this is something that is allowed and would get approved (after
following the process of course).



Also we have some changes we have made to other packet dissectors that we
will be pushing upstream and as we make new changes putting them back into
the community.



Looking forward from hearing from you and working with the Wireshark
community.



Michelle Bruni

Spirent Communications
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe



-- 

Naima is online.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: