Re: Wireshark on Kali linux

[João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt>]

On 06/02/19 09:08, Dario Lombardo wrote:
>  > This would mean that they'd have to build Wireshark differently from 
> the default way it's built, using the "package for systems that run 
> everything as root" option.  That means a standard Debian package, built 
> to run on a system where you *don't* run everything as root, so that you 
> can leave the safety checks in place, won't be appropriate for Kali.
>
> I was thinking to something like maintaining a list of debian derivative 
> that have just the root account (the version checked with lsb_release) 
> and run something on them during the installation phase.
>
>  > - use something else other than error() when disabling dofile()
>  > (something that won't generate such a disruptive dialog window for 
> example).
>
> That was my first try. Something like error -> warning, but I didn't 
> find anything useful. Are you aware of something?

I'm not aware of anything out-of-the-box. It would probably require some 
UX work in Qt to make this notification more user-friendly.

I have some doubts about the effectiveness and usefulness of this Lua 
sandbox. I didn't investigate in depth but it seems enabling/disabling 
the Lua runtime instead would be better, as dictated by policy (whatever 
that policy is).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe