Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Memory leak debugging - current master passes all tests!
From: Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:59:30 +0100
Impressive achievement, Peter! On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:03 PM Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl> wrote:
This does not mean that there are no more memory leaks though (we have pretty bad test coverage)
Have you ever tried to compute the coverage with, eg., gcov/lcov? I'm working on it but it's still a WIP. There are also public platforms (as coveralls) that help keeping track of it over time/over history.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Memory leak debugging - current master passes all tests! Peter Wu (Jan 28)
- Re: Memory leak debugging - current master passes all tests! Jaap Keuter (Jan 28)
- Re: Memory leak debugging - current master passes all tests! Dario Lombardo (Jan 29)
- Re: Memory leak debugging - current master passes all tests! Jeff Morriss (Jan 29)
- Re: Memory leak debugging - current master passes all tests! Peter Wu (Jan 30)