Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: “bytes on wire” vs. “bytes captured”


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:43:05 -0700

On Jul 19, 2019, at 5:52 AM, Holger Pfrommer <HPfrommer () hilscher com> wrote:

Now my question: I would be very useful to use pcap’s caplen and len values to report original packet length while a 
capture device adds additional data to a frame, for example a header containing some more details about the frame 
itself.

It might be very useful to, in some fashion, indicate that additional information has been added by a capture device.

It would be *incorrect* to use the capture length in a record (pcap, pcapng, or other file type) to indicate the length 
of on-the-wire data plus additional data, because the capture length is intended to indicate the length after "slicing".

If an additional header is added, that should be indicated by using a different link-layer header type; see, for 
example:

        LINKTYPE_IEEE802_11, in which the packet data begins with an IEEE 802.11 header, vs. 
LINKTYPE_IEEE802_11_RADIOTAP, in which the packet data begins with a radiotap header giving radio information, followed 
by an 802.11 header;

        LINKTYPE_DOCSIS, in which the packet data begins with a DOCSIS MAC frame header, vs. LINKTYPE_DOCSIS31_XRA31, 
in which the packet data begins with a metadata header giving additional frame information, followed by a DOCSIS MAC 
frame or other DOCSIS packet header;

        LINKTYPE_ETHERNET, in which case the packet data begins with an Ethernet header, vs. LINKTYPE_NETANALYZER, in 
which case the packet data begins with a metadata header giving additional information about the packet, followed by an 
Ethernet header.

Note also that a capture device could both add a metadata header *AND* slice the frame; it's not as if adding a header 
at the beginning and slicing data off at the end are mutually exclusive.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: