Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Hmmm, don't understand why this failed
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:33:03 -0800
On Mar 6, 2019, at 7:12 PM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com> wrote:
I got this error with my latest petri-dish build: 31: ====================================================================== 31: FAIL: test_unit_fieldcount (suite_unittests.case_unittests) 31: fieldcount 31: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 31: Traceback (most recent call last): 31: File "/home/wireshark/builders/ubuntu-x86-64-petri-dish/ubuntu-x86-64-petri-dish/build/test/fixtures.py", line 47, in wrapped 31: test_fn(self, *fixtures) 31: File "/home/wireshark/builders/ubuntu-x86-64-petri-dish/ubuntu-x86-64-petri-dish/build/test/suite_unittests.py", line 53, in test_unit_fieldcount 31: self.assertRun((cmd_tshark, '-G', 'fieldcount'), env=test_env) 31: File "/home/wireshark/builders/ubuntu-x86-64-petri-dish/ubuntu-x86-64-petri-dish/build/test/subprocesstest.py", line 289, in assertRun 31: self.assertEqual(process.returncode, expected_return) 31: AssertionError: 1 != 0 31: 31: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 31: Ran 8 tests in 7.366s 31: 31: FAILED (failures=1) Not sure what the error is. Can anyone help?
From a recent build: $ build/run/tshark -G fieldcount There are 215003 header fields registered, of which: 0 are deregistered 2533 are protocols 16078 have the same name as another field 215000 fields were pre-allocated. * * Please increase PROTO_PRE_ALLOC_HF_FIELDS_MEM (in epan/proto.c)! * * The header field table consumes 1687 KiB of memory. The fields themselves consume 15117 KiB of memory. $ echo $? 1 I boosted the #define in question to 220000 in https://code.wireshark.org/review/c/32345/ and it now works. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Hmmm, don't understand why this failed Richard Sharpe (Mar 06)
- Re: Hmmm, don't understand why this failed Guy Harris (Mar 06)
- Re: Hmmm, don't understand why this failed Richard Sharpe (Mar 06)
- Re: Hmmm, don't understand why this failed Guy Harris (Mar 06)