Re: Qt availability changes

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Jan 28, 2020, at 2:24 AM, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:

> As noted somewhere in the linked discussion, I suspect that the end result will be projects caching a "suitable" 
> version for a while and then periodically, e.g. major releases, updating to the current latest.  It's too much work 
> to track latest with the potential for introducing new bugs.  In summary this will have the opposite effect to that 
> which Qt expects.

The FOSS community interprets annoying licensing terms as damage and routes around them?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe