Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Some apparent type bugs
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:47:21 +0200
Hi Anders, This code in packet-pfcp.c, line 7482 looks wrong to me /* Octet 5 to 20 NF Instance ID */ proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint(tree, hf_pfcp_nf_instance_id, tvb, offset, 1, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN, &id_length); Isn’t this supposed to be /* Octet 5 to 20 NF Instance ID */ proto_tree_add_item(tree, hf_pfcp_nf_instance_id, tvb, offset, id_length, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN); offset += id_length; Thanks, Jaap
On 31 Jul 2020, at 11:28, Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> wrote: Error: proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint (.., hf_pfcp_nf_instance_id , ...) called at ./tools/../epan/dissectors/packet-pfcp.c 7482 with type FT_GUID (allowed types are {'FT_CHAR', 'FT_UINT32', 'FT_UINT24', 'FT_UINT16', 'FT_UINT8'} )
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Some apparent type bugs Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Jaap Keuter (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Jaap Keuter (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs John Thacker (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Jaap Keuter (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs John Thacker (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Jaap Keuter (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Jaap Keuter (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev (Jul 31)
- Re: Some apparent type bugs Jaap Keuter (Jul 31)