Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 14:36:04 +0200
On 5/4/20 11:24 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
Hi, I have already on the past try to rebuild parlay and remember i don't get the same output... but like Luke say, it will be coming from dict don't sort correctly Luke, can you push your ./idl-regen on CMakeList.txt ? we can (need) to add a step on buildbot for rebuild (all)dissector and check if we have the same output... Cheers
Hi Alexis, So that would be these, the SNMP dissectors and what am I missing? Anyway, this can peel off in a seperate change set, I'm going to focus on cleaning up the generated IDL dissectors. Thanks, Jaap PS: I think idl-regen can be somewhat generalized, and make use of what idl2wrs does? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (May 01)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (May 01)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (May 03)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (May 04)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (May 04)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Alexis La Goutte (May 04)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (May 04)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (May 04)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Luke Mewburn (May 03)
- Re: Regenerating packet-parlay.c Jaap Keuter (May 01)