Re: SCTP Reassembly Question

[Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen () lurchi franken de>]

> On 16. Aug 2021, at 18:57, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
>
> I've been poking at the bug in
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/15584 but I've hit the
> limit of what I can glean from the SCTP RFC on reassembly. If anybody
> is familiar with the protocol and could provide some guidance as to
> the correct behaviour when given nested begin/end data fragments, that
> would be helpful.
It is a illegal sender behaviour. I can take a look at it (not right now),
but I assigned the bug to me...

Best regards
Michael
> Thanks,
> Evan
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe