Re: OID not implemented

[chuck c <bubbasnmp () gmail com>]

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6962/?include_text=1
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         B. Laurie
Request for Comments: 6962                                    A. Langley
Category: Experimental                                         E. Kasper
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                   Google
                                                               June 2013

"   This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community."

Maybe it will move to a different branch if ever made official?

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:40 AM Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 17:30, chuck c <bubbasnmp () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > You were not wrong.
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers/enterprise-numbers
> > 11129
> >   Google, Inc.
> >     Ben Laurie
> >       benl&google.com
> >
> > 1.3.6.1.4.1 is Private.Enterprise and the next branch (11129) is the
> > Enterprise ID.
> Which then further mystifies me as to why the ITU has .2.4.2 and .2.4.5
> allocated as children of 111129.
>
>
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:20 AM Graham Bloice <
> > graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
> >
> > > Well now I'm embarrassed, I'd fat fingered the OID into the lookup site
> > > and wandered down a rabbit hole from there.  Odd that the OID info site
> > > returns Google for 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129 which led me astray.  Sorry for the
> > > noise.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 17:04, chuck c <bubbasnmp () gmail com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What version of Wireshark?
> > > > Supported added here:
> > > > https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/commit/c529e9110a211bc445a94c2ed68acc14fe108384
> > > > TLS: add Signed Certificate Timestamp support (RFC 6962)
> > > > Feb 14, 2017 5:09pm CST
> > > >
> > > >     /* Certificate Transparency extensions: 2 (Certificate), 5 (OCSP
> > > > Response) */
> > > >     register_ber_oid_dissector("1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.2",
> > > > dissect_tls_sct_ber, proto_ssl, "SignedCertificateTimestampList");
> > > >     register_ber_oid_dissector("1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.5",
> > > > dissect_tls_sct_ber, proto_ssl, "SignedCertificateTimestampList");
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:49 AM Graham Bloice <
> > > > graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It appears to be an unregistered OID,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 16:23, Petersen Sean <Sean.Petersen () kapsch net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you give me some more context on what the below means:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this just a wireshark error or is this an indication of something
> > > > > > unhealthy with the communication?
> > > > > This appears to be an unregistered OID, 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129 is
> > > > > registered to Google (http://oid-info.com/get/1.3.6.1.4.1.11129), but
> > > > > the only children are 1 (gsa) and 5 (googleCloudHealthcare)
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a property of the certificate, not a communication issue.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Sean Petersen  | * Systems Engineer, New Zealand
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mobile  +64 21-417-7388
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sean.petersen () kapsch net
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Kapsch TrafficCom New Zealand Ltd*
> > > > > > PO Box 46051, Herne Bay  I  Auckland 1147  I  New Zealand
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Visiting Address: Level 4 | AMP Tower | 29 Customs Street West |
> > > > > > Auckland CBD  I  Auckland 1010  I  New Zealand
> > > > > >
> > > > > > www.kapsch.net/au/en  |  www.kapsch.net
> > > > > > NZBN 9429033760506  I  Registered office Auckland
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*
> > >
> > > --
> > > Graham Bloice
>
> --
> Graham Bloice
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe