Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Failed pipeline for nvmeof_getlog_page | wireshark | 3a8e09ef


From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:41:03 +1000

It seems like you already know what is wrong and how to solve this.
Why not just change your patch so it does not trigger this compiler
error/warning?


Maybe the compiler is overly sensitive here? Who knows.
Why is this a problem for wireshark developers?

Do this:
* fix your code so it does not trigger the warnings.  Wireshark developers
are not supposed to
keep track of what are false warnings that are bogus or what are real
problems.
* if you have a problem with the compiler, bring it up with them. we are
not compiler developers or maintainers.
* work on your people skills. You are rubbing people that could help you in
seriosly the wrong way.


On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 5:21 PM Constantine Gavrilov <CONSTG () il ibm com>
wrote:

I have a question regarding for a special form of automatic builds that I
do not understand.

Occasionally, I get an email for additional pipeline build that is
different from default pipeline linked to the ticket. It is a wider set of
compilers and distributions.

Several questions:

   1. What is the significance of this and when it is triggered?
   2. Why it is not linked to MR (meaning I cannot see this failure in
   MR)?
   3. Shall I fix these failures?
   4. How do I know that the issue is fixed, since such builds are not
   linked to MR?
   5.

I have looked at this particular one, and it is a a bug in compiler:

guint64 off =...; /* take from command context, now looking at reply */
if (off < 40)
        proto_add_item(...., .... 40-off,.....);

So, the error (in CLANG-11) is (40-off) is 64-bit and passing it as 32-bit
parameter "looses high-order bits".

First, the compiler shall see that no loss of value takes place because of
the "IF" statement here. Second, since when passing 64-bit value as a
32-bit parameter shall be a compiler error in C language?

I can easily fix this (check the value in saved context, and if it is
above possible payload length return, then declare off as 32-bit), but I
need to know if CLANG-11 (with draconian compile options) is a MUST to
pass.


-
----------------------------------------
Constantine Gavrilov
Storage Architect
Master Inventor
Tel-Aviv Storage Lab IDT Lead
Tel-Aviv IBM Storage Lab
1 Azrieli Center, Tel-Aviv
----------------------------------------
----- Forwarded by Constantine Gavrilov/Israel/IBM on 03/31/2021 10:07 AM
-----

From:        GitLab <gitlab () mg gitlab com>
To:
Date:        03/30/2021 05:37 PM
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Failed pipeline for nvmeof_getlog_page |
wireshark | 3a8e09ef
Sent by:        gitlab () mg gitlab com
------------------------------


Pipeline #278885577 has failed!   Project Constantine Gavrilov / wireshark
Branch nvmeof_getlog_page Commit
‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
*This Message Is From an External Sender *
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Pipeline #278885577 has failed!


Project
Constantine Gavrilov <https://gitlab.com/constg2021>/ wireshark
<https://gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark>
Branch
nvmeof_getlog_page
<https://gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark/-/commits/nvmeof_getlog_page>

Commit
3a8e09ef
<https://gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark/-/commit/3a8e09ef456178d296452a05fa3624a7755820bf>
NVMe: Get LogPage: Commands Supported and Effects
Commit Author
Constantine Gavrilov <https://gitlab.com/constg2021>



Pipeline #278885577
<https://gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark/-/pipelines/278885577>triggered
by
Constantine Gavrilov <https://gitlab.com/constg2021>

had 1 failed build.
Failed builds
build

clang-11 <https://gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark/-/jobs/1140094712>




You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. Manage
all notifications <https://gitlab.com/-/profile/notifications> · Help
<https://gitlab.com/help>



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: