Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Unresponsive Vendor
From: Meidinger Chris <chris.meidinger () badenit de>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:14:13 +0100
I was going to recommend reading that as well -- as you already did, i will simply second the recommendation. The timeframe that rain forest puppy laid out in that paper is appropriate. Chris Meidinger IT Technology and Services badenIT GmbH Innovationstechnologie für Ihre Zukunft Tel. +49 761 279 2280 Fax. +49 761 279 2200 Tullastrasse 70 79108 Freiburg Deutschland -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Davis [mailto:talesian () istop com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:36 PM To: Matt Burnett; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Unresponsive Vendor I'm not sure how many vendors will say that it is standard but amoung the hacking community that does notify vendors of exploits, I believe that the RFP policy is considered to be standard and fair. As well as being fairly straight forward. http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/policy.html -----Original Message----- From: Matt Burnett [mailto:marukka () mac com] Sent: November 19, 2003 2:03 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Unresponsive Vendor I have a moral question for all of you. I have notified a major software company in the past about security issues with their software. I did email them with enough details to replicate the issue. However they never responded to my email, and a couple years later they fixed the issue and did not give credit were due. I'm sure other researchers contacted them with a similar but different way to exploit the flaw, but no one at all is given credit. Now I have a local d0s for their product and have contacted them again, this time via phone. After notifying them they gave me a case number and said a engineer would be in contact with me in approximately a week. I'm guessing that something similar will happen and this issue wont get fixed for a while, and once again I wont get credit. I'm just wondering what would be a fair time frame before releasing a exploit, and what I could/should do about receiving credit. I have looked at some papers online about when you should release a exploit but none i've read yet give any guidance on what you should do if the vendor is dragging their feet. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Unresponsive Vendor, (continued)
- RE: Unresponsive Vendor Tim Donahue (Nov 20)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor JohnNicholson (Nov 20)
- RE: Unresponsive Vendor mrodrigu (Nov 20)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor Meritt James (Nov 21)
- RE: Unresponsive Vendor Randy Golly (Nov 20)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor c_brauckmiller (Nov 20)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor Matt Burnett (Nov 20)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor Peter Schawacker (Nov 20)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor Matt Burnett (Nov 21)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor Matt Burnett (Nov 20)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor Pieter-Bas IJdens (Nov 21)
- RE: Unresponsive Vendor Meidinger Chris (Nov 21)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor mrodrigu (Nov 21)
- Re: Unresponsive Vendor Matt Burnett (Nov 21)