Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Windows Server 2003
From: Rick Hale <optik () wccnet org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:32:07 -0400 (EDT)
If anyone knows of a system that is secure out of the box, let us know right away. Otherwise we will continue assuming that it is an impossibility.
i am going to rant. the whole notion of a system, secure out of the box, is make-believe. to those who seek such a thing, i have this to say to you - you are wrong to assume it will either be black, or it will be white. are you failing to understand, you have to USE that system!?!? users, businesses, governments, educational institutions, whatever... all have different needs. it is foolish to assume Bill Gates, Linus Torvalds, Steve Jobs, <insert your sectarianly bigoted OS here> can say kazaam, and *poof* ship you a 100%, absolutely secure, unhackable system. if that were possible, there would be no need for IT professionals. i happen to agree with the previous poster's comment wrt openbsd; it is currently the most security minded, publically available, OS. -rik --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Captus Networks Are you prepared for the next Sobig & Blaster? - Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans - Precisely Define and Implement Network Security - Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic FIND OUT NOW - FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit http://www.captusnetworks.com/ads/42.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- AW: Windows Server 2003 Meidinger Chris (Sep 11)
- Re: Windows Server 2003 @Lx (Sep 11)
- Re: Windows Server 2003 Rick Hale (Sep 12)
- Re: Windows Server 2003 - Not secure from my test but OSX from Mac is secure from the start Randy Opper (Sep 12)
- Re: Windows Server 2003 - Not secure from my test but OSX from Mac is secure from the start Sebastian Schneider (Sep 15)
- Re: Windows Server 2003 Rick Hale (Sep 12)
- Re: Windows Server 2003 @Lx (Sep 11)