Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Why Security testing is required
From: "Meritt James" <meritt_james () bah com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:08:29 -0500
Please note that the thief is asked to break into the safes, not taking your money, nor locking it away, nor hiding the key (from himself?). Navaneetharangan wrote:
Hi all, A couple of days after reading this post, I came across a very interesting definition for Security. The speaker actually said, "Security doesn't lie in keeping your money in a fireproof safe, locking it and hiding the key in a far away island, but lies in making a few such safes, locking them and asking a thief to try and break it." This means that no security measure is complete without testing it thoroughly. Regards C.Navaneetharangan CISA
-- James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA Booz | Allen | Hamilton phone: (410) 684-6566 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Why Security testing is required Matt Lyon (Feb 20)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Meritt James (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Rishi Pande (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required steve (Feb 24)
- most that can happan (was Re: Why Security testing is required Meritt James (Feb 25)
- RE: Why Security testing is required David Gillett (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Byron Sonne (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required captgoodnight (Feb 24)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Navaneetharangan (Feb 26)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Meritt James (Feb 26)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Navaneetharangan (Feb 26)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Raoul Armfield (Feb 24)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Steve (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why Security testing is required Fralick, Alan (Feb 25)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Ryan Cornelsen (Feb 27)