Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Securing Linux based public access terminals
From: "Rocky Heckman" <rocky.he () g-wizinnovations com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:00:33 +1000
So how will this work with the new Longhorn/Whidbey products that are coming out that require a window to display chrome? It also requires the window to be displayed in the viewable area which rules out sizing it bigger than the viewport. R -----Original Message----- From: Brett Anderson [mailto:brett () cs jhu edu] Sent: Tuesday, 20 July 2004 6:39 AM To: mr.happy Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals The window manager, ratpoison, is essentially the same except that it makes things a bit more usable. There are no window decorations and main windows are full-screen. Sub-windows such as a find dialog or a download box, would be nicely centered in the middle of the screen. It is very minimal but with simple and intuitive presentation. As I mentioned before, you would have to remove the command that allows you to run new programs. On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 07:16, mr.happy wrote:
The thing is, you don't have to run a window manager. when the machine boots and the user logs in you could just put 'firefox' or something into the xinitrc file and then only firefox will run. There will be _no_ window support what so ever, and newly opened windows will all 'stick' to the upper left corner of the screen, give it a try... greets, Dirk On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:48, Andrew Shore wrote:What I would like to is run a Linux workstation (RedHat probably 9 even though it's out of support) but when the user logs into the windows session all they get is the browser. No menus no right click on the desk top just a basic single application "dumb terminal". I've seen this done before but it was too well secured for me to see how it was done! Also I'd like to the workstation to log straight in as a local user with out user intervention. Any ideas how I can achieve this or perhaps secure it in another way, I remember with windows 3.x you could change the windows manager settings in win.ini and it did exactly what I want. I just really don't want to use Windows 3.1 ;)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Securing Linux based public access terminals Andrew Shore (Jul 16)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Ant (Jul 16)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Michael Rice (Jul 19)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Brett Anderson (Jul 17)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Jay Fougere (Jul 20)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Brett Anderson (Jul 20)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Jim McCullough (Jul 21)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Jay Fougere (Jul 22)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Jay Fougere (Jul 20)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Ant (Jul 16)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Brett Anderson (Jul 20)
- RE: Securing Linux based public access terminals Rocky Heckman (Jul 21)
- RE: Securing Linux based public access terminals Brett Anderson (Jul 21)
- RE: Securing Linux based public access terminals Rocky Heckman (Jul 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Securing Linux based public access terminals tbishop (Jul 16)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Jordan Cole (stilist) (Jul 19)
- RE: Securing Linux based public access terminals M Shirk (Jul 20)
- Re: Securing Linux based public access terminals Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Jul 21)