Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RBLs for SPAM Control
From: Alexis <bonobo () bigpond net au>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:46:04 +1000
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:08 pm, Devdas Bhagat wrote:
Your next paragraph indicates that you are on the duhl.dnsbl.sorbs.net list. That is especially meant to list dynamic IP addresses which should not be sending direct to MX.
Hmm . . . . even addresses which, once allocated, might not change for weeks at a time? i'm on cable . . . .
Different DNSBLs have different policies. list.dsbl.org does not time out, but delists on request. The sbl removes IPs based on the removal of the spammer. Spamcop has a three day lifetime for its entries. Normal entries from dnsbl.sorbs.net expire in three months, but never from the duhl.
*nod* Okay, thanks. Alexis.
Current thread:
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control security (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RBLs for SPAM Control Chris Santerre (Aug 02)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 02)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Micheal Espinola Jr (Aug 02)
- Re: Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Phil Cryer (Aug 03)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Alexis (Aug 03)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 04)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Alexis (Aug 05)
- Message not available
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Alexis (Aug 05)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 08)
- RE: RBLs for SPAM Control David Gillett (Aug 10)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control Devdas Bhagat (Aug 04)
- Re: RBLs for SPAM Control maxfield (Aug 08)