Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: Windows Vista current flaws


From: DMORROW5 () satx rr com
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:33:19 -0700

Initial thoughts are to disallow the new OS until you have tested it 
yourself. Either that, or some input from a third party who has 
already conducted some objective testing on their own. Just my 2 cents.

kind regards,

Dana Morrow

----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Lawhead <samurai () berkeley edu>
Date: Monday, September 26, 2005 9:00 pm
Subject: Windows Vista current flaws

Greetings all,

I work in Network Security for UC Berkeley's residence halls.  We 
have a list of several "minimum 
security standards" that we require all connected computers to 
meet before being allowed access to 
the network (stuff like having a firewall program, antivirus, 
etc).  One of the standards involves 
having the latest patched version of a secure operating system.  I 
have a user on the network who 
wishes to run a (legitimately acquired, or so he says) version of 
Windows Vista beta version. 
Before I decide on this, I wanted opinions on whether or not this 
is a good idea.  My first 
instinct is to disallow any beta operating systems simply on the 
grounds that they'll be buggy by 
definition and may potentially have serious security flaws, but I 
can't find anything to back this 
up.  Just wondering if I could get a few opinions on whether or 
not this is a good idea.  Thanks!


Jon Lawhead
Network Security Coordinator
Residential Computing
University of California, Berkeley



Current thread: