Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Windows Vista current flaws
From: Cony Zhou 周圣 <Cony.Zhou () Cpic-Ing Com Cn>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:48:44 +0800
I don't think it is a good idea to use the beta product in your environment. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Pacific-Antai Life Insurance Company Limited IT Department Cony Zhou 周圣 MCSE,MVP,CIW Security Analyst TEL: 86-21-68863183*1938 E-mail: Cony.zhou () cpic-ing com cn ------------------------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Jon Lawhead [mailto:samurai () berkeley edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:01 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Windows Vista current flaws Greetings all, I work in Network Security for UC Berkeley's residence halls. We have a list of several "minimum security standards" that we require all connected computers to meet before being allowed access to the network (stuff like having a firewall program, antivirus, etc). One of the standards involves having the latest patched version of a secure operating system. I have a user on the network who wishes to run a (legitimately acquired, or so he says) version of Windows Vista beta version. Before I decide on this, I wanted opinions on whether or not this is a good idea. My first instinct is to disallow any beta operating systems simply on the grounds that they'll be buggy by definition and may potentially have serious security flaws, but I can't find anything to back this up. Just wondering if I could get a few opinions on whether or not this is a good idea. Thanks! Jon Lawhead Network Security Coordinator Residential Computing University of California, Berkeley ---------------------------------------------------- 注意: 本电子邮件所载的,是向收件人所发出的私人的、保密的讯息。如 您误收本邮件,请注意任何对该邮件的披露,复制、传播或使用的 行为均被严格禁止。就误收邮件的情况,请您以回复方式通知发件 人,并删除该邮件,不得打开或复制。 所有讯息和附件都已进行病毒检测。如本讯息附有密码保护的附件, 则太平洋安泰的邮件系统并没有对其进行病毒检测。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information in this Internet email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Internet email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this Internet email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing Pacific-Antai's terms of business or client engagement letter. Visit us at www.Cpic-Ing.Com.Cn --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Windows Vista current flaws Jon Lawhead (Sep 27)
- Re: Windows Vista current flaws Micheal Espinola Jr (Sep 28)
- Re: Windows Vista current flaws Sean Earp (Sep 28)
- RE: Windows Vista current flaws Joe_Wulf (Sep 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Windows Vista current flaws Roger A. Grimes (Sep 28)
- RE: Windows Vista current flaws Lance.Druger (Sep 28)
- Re: Windows Vista current flaws DMORROW5 (Sep 28)
- RE: Windows Vista current flaws Kofron, Matt (Sep 28)
- RE: Windows Vista current flaws Lance.Druger (Sep 28)
- RE: Windows Vista current flaws Burton Strauss (Sep 30)
- RE: Windows Vista current flaws Cony Zhou 周圣 (Sep 30)
- Re: RE: Windows Vista current flaws kinoka2k (Sep 30)
- Re: Windows Vista current flaws Micheal Espinola Jr (Sep 28)