Re: Anyone plans for CISSP-ISSMP?

[Bora Özden <vbozden () e-kolay net>]

 Hi,

Im planning for CISSP for a long time but i dont have much time to study 
and recover /remember most of the things i have read before. Im looking 
for to renew my resources i have a hard copy of an Wiley (?) book as i 
can remember but must be a little out of date, and also want to renew my 
web links too. The requirements also were mean to change i dont know the 
latest situation though i know when the next exam will be here in 
İstanbul . (yes i have some oldie e-documents too)

See you all

Bora Özden







Jayson Agagnier wrote:
> The ISSMP should not be all that hard if you already have your CISSP and
> several year experience in any sort of an organization with more than a
> 1000 employees.  You will need to know a lot more high level Information
> Security information such a governance models, policies, costs related
> to risk/loss, insuarance, BC/DR, handling of PII, etc.
>
> If your already in management, or ready to go into mangement, then you
> will pass the ISSMP.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Jayson Agagnier
> Information Security
> NVIDIA Corporation
> 2701 San Tomas Expressway
> Santa Clara, CA 95050
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
> On Behalf Of WALI
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 6:02 PM
> To: security-basics () securityfocus com
> Subject: Anyone plans for CISSP-ISSMP?
>
> Hi list
>
> Amongst the two CISM and ISSMP, I have decided that I should (in the
> near or far future) give ISSMP a take. It's been quite a few years since
> I have had CISSP and wouldn't mind getting another paper worth a few
> hundred dollars. The reason I say this is general realization that
> certification never translated to required skill levels, needed to make
> a mark within the security community.
>
> Now, someone has told me ISSMP is indeed a tough nut to crack with no
> packaged Review material/CBK available (unlike CISM), it makes it bit
> more harder.
>
> Anyone can suggest, where should I make a start or should I make a start
> at all?
>
>
>
>