Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Why open source software is more secure


From: "Hayes, Ian" <ihayes () nvcancer org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:29:54 -0700

In addition, the recent announcements from Debian and Ubuntu sort of
help throw out the idea that open source is inherently "more secure". 

According to the Debian Security Advisory, a Debian package manager
introduced a fault into the OpenSSL package for Debian in 2006 and has
persisted until now.

--
Ian Hayes
Systems Engineer
Nevada Cancer Institute
Office:(702) 822-5156
email: ihayes () nvcancer org
http://www.nevadacancerinstitute.org

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com
[mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
On Behalf Of Craig Wright
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:40 AM
To: 'Robinson, Sonja'; Alexander Klimov;
security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Why open source software is more secure

OSS hides through obscurity in some ways. It is rare for all lines to
be
checked by all users. So obscurity by volume. So obscurity by volume.

Using Olly and IDA to reverse Microsoft products is a pastime for many
people and I see more people checking Microsoft products then some
obscure
OSS with source. There is more bang for the proverbial in reversing
closed
source code from a major vendor. The bugs pay more than for an obscure
OSS.

The arguments assume that OSS with source is the only way to check
code. I
have seen a good deal of Microsoft code that has been reconstructed
from
reversing tools.

Regards,
Craig Wright (GSE-Compliance)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, 
and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or 
distribute this e-mail message or its attachments. If you 
believe you have received this e-mail message in error, 
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the original message


Current thread: