Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation
From: Mike Saldivar <Mike.Saldivar () usurf usu edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:27:43 +0000
You can recommend a migration to Google Apps or McAfee MX Logic, they both seem to have very good spam filtering. Or, develop a process whereby anyone who gets spam has their e-mail address changed, and must attend a training class on How To Not Use Work Email For Anything Besides Work Communication. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Steve Sirag Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:05 AM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Spam prevention vs mitigation Hi, My bosses are demanding 100% spam prevention, and I'd like to find some industry papers, articles, etc that explains why that's not advisable (if even possible). My understanding is that spam mitigation is the goal, keeping spam down to where it's not a distraction from business. Our current spam level is roughly 3-6 spams received per user per day. That seems manageable to me, but I'd like the extra ammunition going into the meeting. Can anyone help? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation, (continued)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Erik Soosalu (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Champ Clark III (Apr 12)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Steve Melcher (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Clint Davis (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Champ Clark III (Apr 12)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Gillmer, Renier, VF-NZ (Apr 15)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Champ Clark III (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Todd Haverkos (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Champ Clark III (Apr 12)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Joseph Laico (Apr 12)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Ansgar Wiechers (Apr 15)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Mike Saldivar (Apr 15)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Vincent Yeo (Apr 15)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation kartik . netsec (Apr 15)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation rmassanet (Apr 16)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation David Gillett (Apr 18)
- Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Michael Painter (Apr 19)
- RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Erik Soosalu (Apr 12)