Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: RPC protocol problem?
From: D.Mitchell () dcs shef ac uk (Dave Mitchell)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 10:32:49 BST
The portmap protocol procedure number 5 is an RPC call forwarding service. You specify to a remote portmap that you would like it to call a routine on the remote host for you, and give you the results back. (why this is in there is beyond me...)
I think it's there for broadcast commands such as rusers - a client just broadcasts a request to every portmapper on the net to call rpc.rusersd on its behalf - otherwise it would have to individually contact each rpc.rusersd daemon. Anyway, am I correct in believing that the export bug only works if the fileystem is exported to localhost, and not for the "real" local hostname or aliases? Dave. * David Mitchell, Systems Administrator, email: D.Mitchell () dcs shef ac uk * Dept. Computer Science, Sheffield Uni. phone: +44 114-282-5573 * 211 Portobello St, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK. fax: +44 114-278-0972 * * Standards (n). Battle insignia or tribal totems
Current thread:
- Re: RPC protocol problem?, (continued)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? der Mouse (Aug 24)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? prince of insufficient light (Aug 24)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Eric Conrad (Aug 24)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? jsz (Aug 24)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Rafi Sadowsky (Aug 24)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Eric Conrad (Aug 25)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Casper Dik (Aug 29)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Casper Dik (Aug 29)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? jsz (Aug 24)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Jukka Ukkonen (Aug 25)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Dave Goldberg (Aug 25)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Dave Mitchell (Aug 25)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Peter Wemm (Aug 25)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Alexander Haiut (Aug 26)
- Re: RPC protocol problem? Peter Wemm (Aug 25)