Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Request for discussion.
From: aleph1 () dfw net (Aleph One)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 00:40:29 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 7 Feb 1995, Karl Strickland wrote:
ps can already run without priveledges. mount -t procfs /dev/kmem /proc Assuming you use a "Real OS(tm)" ;-)On what OS? Isnt it the case that ps's on these /proc systems often need to run setuid root, so that than can ioctl(2) everyone's processes?
For an example of a non setuid ps and a great proc filesystem take a look at the Linux implementaion of the two.
-- ------------------------------------------+----------------------------------- Mailed using ELM on FreeBSD | Karl Strickland PGP 2.3a Public Key Available. | Internet: karl () bagpuss demon co uk |
Current thread:
- Re: Request for discussion., (continued)
- Re: Request for discussion. Timothy Newsham (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Timothy Newsham (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Casper Dik (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Timothy Newsham (Feb 07)
- Possible backdoor in ftpd? James Seng (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Timothy Newsham (Feb 06)
- Re: Request for discussion. Stephen D. Williams (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Aleph One (Feb 07)
- Re: Request for discussion. Julian Assange (Feb 08)
- Re: Request for discussion. Casper Dik (Feb 08)
- Re: Request for discussion. Karl Strickland (Feb 08)
- Re: Request for discussion. Casper Dik (Feb 08)
- Sniffer FAQ Christopher Klaus (May 27)
- Security FAQes Update Christopher Klaus (May 27)
- Re: Request for discussion. Silicon Avatar (Feb 09)
- X authentication Timothy Newsham (Feb 09)
- Re: X authentication Stephen Gildea (Feb 10)
- Semaphores/Setuid root... problem? Pete Hartman (Feb 09)