Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers
From: jna () concorde com (fast forward futurama)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 11:31:44 -0500
Well, once again we're back to my original statement. If you've pulled /dev/nit out (or hell, set the proper permissions on all the /dev/nit's in the building and encased all of your network cable in solid steel or some millitary-style pressurized-glass-tube nightmare, you still should make sure that someone can't get root! This is a stupid topic. If we're being this paranoid about the cables themselves, start using Kerberos. Start Encrypting. Who gives a hoot about the kernel and /dev/nit when the person has root on your system? -john
Current thread:
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers fast forward futurama (Mar 01)
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers System Administrator (Mar 02)
- Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Larry Glaze (Mar 02)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Christian A. Ratliff (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Larry Glaze (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Software Test Account (Mar 07)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Steve Robbins (Mar 10)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Christian A. Ratliff (Mar 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers F. L. Charles Seeger III (Mar 01)
- Re: snooper watchers der Mouse (Mar 01)