Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: impossible vs. impractical
From: perry () imsi com (Perry E. Metzger)
Date: Mon, 08 May 1995 10:02:31 -0400
Dr. Frederick B. Cohen says:
Oh good. I think possibility has practicality implied. After all, if you can generate an infinite amount of energy, you CAN go the speed of light (according to the current laws of physics), so there, it's not impossible.But according to current physics, there is a finite amount of total energy in the Universe,
You've proven the Universe is closed then, and non-inflationary to boot? You are better than I suspected, Dr. Cohen. .pm
Current thread:
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Melvin Klassen (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Mike Neuman (May 07)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Mike O'Connor (May 10)
- password backdoors System Admin (May 10)
- Error in the Lorenz-Fitzgerald assumption. A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security (May 10)
- Re: password backdoors Nathan Lawson (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- and now, back to your regularly scheduled discussion topic... robert owen thomas (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Aleph One (May 08)
- R. Thomas's NFS question PETER.T.WHITING () sprint sprint com (May 09)
- Re: R. Thomas's NFS question Marek Michalkiewicz (May 10)