Bugtraq mailing list archives
and now, back to your regularly scheduled discussion topic...
From: rthomas () pamd cig mot com (robert owen thomas)
Date: Mon, 8 May 1995 10:01:39 -0500
== > Oh good. I think possibility has practicality implied. After all, if you == > can generate an infinite amount of energy, you CAN go the speed of light == > (according to the current laws of physics), so there, it's not impossible. == == But according to current physics, there is a finite amount of total == energy in the Universe, and thus it is impossible to get the infinite == energy required to do this - again, impossible, not infeasible. oh, please. this discussion has exited the realm of bugtraq, bypassed the realm of silly, and firmly entrenched itself in the realm of the absurd. enough. and now for something completely different (apologies to M. Python): ObBug: i have recently discovered that it is possible to re-export an imported filesystem under Linux. to illustrate: hostA --> exports /usr/share to -access=hostB hostB --> a linux box. re-exports /usr/share to everyone hostC --> not implicitly trusted by hostA, mounts /usr/share aside from any security concerns, this would certainly thrash your nfsd's. does anyone have any experience with this? i have only recently discovered this, and have not had time to peruse it in depth. regards, --robert -- o robert owen thomas: Unix consultant. Big Brother. user scratching post. o o e-mail: rthomas () pamd cig mot com --or-- robt () cymru com o o vox: 708.632.5768 fax: 708.632.5694 o o -- System Administrator's Dictionary -- o o user (you'zer) n. 1 A waste of system resources; an unwanted load o o on the processor(s) of a Unix system. 2 Someone who uses Caps Lock. o
Current thread:
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Melvin Klassen (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Mike Neuman (May 07)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Mike O'Connor (May 10)
- password backdoors System Admin (May 10)
- Error in the Lorenz-Fitzgerald assumption. A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security (May 10)
- Re: password backdoors Nathan Lawson (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- and now, back to your regularly scheduled discussion topic... robert owen thomas (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Aleph One (May 08)
- R. Thomas's NFS question PETER.T.WHITING () sprint sprint com (May 09)
- Re: R. Thomas's NFS question Marek Michalkiewicz (May 10)
- RE: Anon site needed for FIP[S] PUB 190 Lawrence E. Bassham (May 09)
- unsubscribe bugtraq parkerm@cs49.holloman ParkerM,TSgt,49CS/SCSC (May 09)
- Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) G.J.W. Hagenaars (May 08)
- Re: Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) ATM_Feel_the_Power (May 09)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical John F. Haugh II (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Tom Ptacek (May 14)