Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: impossible vs. impractical
From: jfh () rpp386 cactus org (John F. Haugh II)
Date: Wed, 10 May 95 22:46:14 CDT
Oh good. I think possibility has practicality implied. After all, if you can generate an infinite amount of energy, you CAN go the speed of light (according to the current laws of physics), so there, it's not impossible.But according to current physics, there is a finite amount of total energy in the Universe, and thus it is impossible to get the infinite energy required to do this - again, impossible, not infeasible.
I seem to have found a bug in my elm mailer. Isn't there supposed to be some way to get rid of mail on a subject you are no longer interested in without having to press the "d" key every time? Would someone please help me fix this bug? -- John F. Haugh II [ NRA-ILA ] [ Kill Barney ] !'s: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh Ma Bell: (512) 251-2151 [GOP][DoF #17][PADI][ENTJ] @'s: jfh () rpp386 cactus org
Current thread:
- Re: password backdoors, (continued)
- Re: password backdoors Nathan Lawson (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 10)
- and now, back to your regularly scheduled discussion topic... robert owen thomas (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Aleph One (May 08)
- R. Thomas's NFS question PETER.T.WHITING () sprint sprint com (May 09)
- Re: R. Thomas's NFS question Marek Michalkiewicz (May 10)
- RE: Anon site needed for FIP[S] PUB 190 Lawrence E. Bassham (May 09)
- unsubscribe bugtraq parkerm@cs49.holloman ParkerM,TSgt,49CS/SCSC (May 09)
- Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) G.J.W. Hagenaars (May 08)
- Re: Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) ATM_Feel_the_Power (May 09)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical John F. Haugh II (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical jon (May 13)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Tom Ptacek (May 14)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical jon (May 14)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Tom Ptacek (May 14)