Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: tcp
From: brian () saturn net (Brian Mitchell)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:48:18 -0400
On Tue, 23 Jul 1996, Bj|rge Eikenes wrote:
I've not heard someone who have done this...maybe because it does not work :) Anyway I have this question. What happends if you create a SYN packet which would initiate a tcp session, the first step in the handshake. Instead of only setting the SYN flag you also set the ACK flag. My question is: server still send back the a packet with its srv_seq0??? Is it possible to create a connection state even with the ACK flag included??
syn+ack should be identified as a reply to a syn. When it gets it, and no connection exists, it will send a rst to the person who sent it. This is why when sequencing, the bad guy sends a flury of syn packets to the host he is pretending to be, so they will never seen the syn+ack packet. Brian Mitchell brian () saturn net "I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell" - H. Truman
Current thread:
- Re: HP/UX 10.01 Remote Administration accoun Jeff Uphoff (Jul 18)
- Re: HP/UX 10.01 Remote Administration accoun Mark Sedlock (Jul 18)
- FreeBSD recent exploits. Andy Dills (Jul 18)
- tcp Bj|rge Eikenes (Jul 23)
- Re: tcp Brian Mitchell (Jul 23)
- dg/ux vulnerbility Brian Mitchell (Jul 23)
- vulnerability in vi under AIX 3.2 Marina Buitrago Bravo (Jul 23)
- Re: vulnerability in vi under AIX 3.2 Bill Pemberton (Jul 23)
- Re: vulnerability in vi under AIX 3.2 (IN LINUX) Nelson N. Escravana (Jul 24)
- FreeBSD recent exploits. Andy Dills (Jul 18)
- Re: FreeBSD recent exploits. Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group (Jul 23)
- Re: HP/UX 10.01 Remote Administration accoun Mark Sedlock (Jul 18)