Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment
From: adam () homeport org (Adam Shostack)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 15:46:10 -0500
Vin McLellan wrote: | With the lethargy of summer behind us, I also expect the issues | raised will enjoy a full and energetic discussion on Adam Shoshack's | SDAdmin mailing list. (Enroll with an "subscribe sdadmin" message to | <majordomo () bbnplanet com>) I look forward to participating. The list is served by majordomo () jabberwocky bbnplanet com. Please don't bother the other majordomo. Other than that, I'll comment that a documented protocol makes discussing it much easier, and call for Security Dynamics to publish their protocols so that security engineers can know they're not relying on security through obscurity. Adam -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume
Current thread:
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Vin McLellan (Sep 10)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Adam Shostack (Sep 10)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Alan Cox (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Mike Neuman (Sep 11)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Vin McLellan (Sep 13)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Alan Cox (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment carson () lehman com (Sep 16)
- Vunerability in HP SAM ? John W. Jacobi (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Elliot Lee (Sep 16)
- CERT Vendor-Initiated Bulletin VB-96.15 - SCO Security Bulletin CERT Bulletin (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Alan Cox (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment What we're dealing with here is a blatant disrespect of the law! (Sep 16)
- SecurID Peiter Z (Sep 17)