Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment
From: carson () lehman com (carson () lehman com)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 19:11:51 -0400
"Alan" == Alan Cox <coxa () cableol net> writes:
Alan> There is no major cost issue. ssh is free except for a small amount of Alan> extra CPU load. Secure mirroring software using rsync and ssh exists. Incorrect. ssh requires commercial users to pay for licenses, and said licenses are _not_ cheap. -- Carson Gaspar -- carson () cs columbia edu carson () lehman com http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~carson/home.html <This is the boring business .sig - no outre sayings here>
Current thread:
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Vin McLellan (Sep 10)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Adam Shostack (Sep 10)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Alan Cox (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Mike Neuman (Sep 11)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Vin McLellan (Sep 13)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Alan Cox (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment carson () lehman com (Sep 16)
- Vunerability in HP SAM ? John W. Jacobi (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Elliot Lee (Sep 16)
- CERT Vendor-Initiated Bulletin VB-96.15 - SCO Security Bulletin CERT Bulletin (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Alan Cox (Sep 16)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment What we're dealing with here is a blatant disrespect of the law! (Sep 16)
- SecurID Peiter Z (Sep 17)
- Re: SecurID White Paper - A Comment Vin McLellan (Sep 16)