Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets
From: adap () INTERLOG COM (Edsel Adap)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 13:37:01 -0400
On Mon, Oct 06, 1997 at 10:34:03AM +0200, Casper Dik wrote:
I think that the xnet sockets did get changed to honor the permissions.
I can confirm this. I have the x/Open book documenting the behavior of Xnet sockets. And it has changed to honor the permissions.
Casper
-- Edsel Adap (905) 669-8375 adap () interlog com adap () andrews edu adap () torfree net edsel () canada sun com http://www.interlog.com/~adap/ LINUX - the choice of the GNU generation! The negation of a disjunction is logically equivalent to the conjunction of the negations and the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the disjunction of the negations. -- DeMorgan DISCLAIMER: The ideas expressed in this message is neither mine or my employer's responsibility!
Current thread:
- Solaris 2.6 and sockets Wojciech Tryc (Oct 03)
- Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets Theo de Raadt (Oct 04)
- Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets Casper Dik (Oct 06)
- Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets Edsel Adap (Oct 06)
- KSR[T] Advisory #3: updatedb / crontabs KSR[T] (Oct 06)
- Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets Casper Dik (Oct 06)
- Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets Thamer Al-Herbish (Oct 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets Eivind Eklund (Oct 12)
- Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets Theo de Raadt (Oct 04)