Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: tcpd remarks warning
From: wietse () PORCUPINE ORG (Wietse Venema)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 17:26:36 -0500
Paul M. Cardon:
I see nothing wrong with a program parsing its own config files the way it wants as long as the behavior is clearly documented. However, code in inetcf.c parses inetd.conf with line continuation, something that inetd does not do in any implementation I have seen. Fortunately, this does not affect the functionality of tcpd itself since it doesn't use the code in inetcf.c. While I believe it is unlikely that a backslash would be placed at the end of a comment line in inetd.conf, tcpdmatch and tcpdcheck could miss problems in inetd.conf that the user would expect to see reported. That's a bug.
The bug is in the eye of the beholder. After the initial release of tcpdchk/tcpdmatch I was informed that some inetd implementations support line continuations, and for that reason I added line continuation support to my inetd.conf parser. Wietse
Current thread:
- tcpd remarks warning Stefano Torricella (Apr 01)
- Re: tcpd remarks warning Greg A. Woods (Apr 02)
- Re: tcpd remarks warning John Line (Apr 02)
- Re: tcpd remarks warning Doug White (Apr 02)
- Re: tcpd remarks warning Paul M. Cardon (Apr 02)
- Re: tcpd remarks warning Wietse Venema (Apr 02)
- Re: tcpd remarks warning Wietse Venema (Apr 02)
- Re: tcpd remarks warning Greg A. Woods (Apr 02)