Bugtraq mailing list archives

(no subject)

From: nobody () REPLAY COM (Anonymous)
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 03:38:32 +0100


Ooh, those pesky NXT records.  Like I process those every day.
Fascinating read in RFC 2535, but suppose I don't have any NXT
records in my own zones, under what circumstances will my DNS server
commit the sin of "the processing of NXT records"?  In other words,
are all of us vulnerable (even caching-only name servers if so, I
imagine!), or only people with NXT records?  This makes a big difference!

Current thread:

(no subject) Anonymous (Nov 10)
- (no subject) David R. Conrad (Nov 11)
  - Re: CERT Advisory CA-99-14 Multiple Vulnerabilities in BIND Solar Designer (Nov 12)
  - Buffer overflow exploit in the alpha linux Taeho Oh (Nov 13)
    - Re: Buffer overflow exploit in the alpha linux Lamont Granquist (Nov 15)
- Re: your mail Brian Wellington (Nov 11)
  - Re: your mail Alan Brown (Nov 12)
  - [ Cobalt ] Security Advisory - Bind Jeff Bilicki (Nov 12)
  - Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS99-049) Aleph One (Nov 12)
- Re: your mail Alain Thivillon (Nov 11)
- [w00giving '99 #3, w00news] UnixWare 7's /var/sadm Matt Conover (Nov 11)

(Thread continues...)