Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: remote DoS against inetd and ssh
From: malokai () GILDEA NET (Vincent Janelle)
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 12:36:24 -0700
This works against a lot of other stuff too.. Thats the problem with inetd, unless you use xinetd. It doesn't really support the limiting of the number of processes that can be open. Its quite easy to fill the process table if you can make enough of the processes linger around. Why run ssh from inetd anyways? I thought thats what its daemon mode is for. If you're worried about it crashing, use the daemontools package, and 'supervise' it. It'll get restarted if the process dies. ------------ Real roxen error message: Error: The server failed to fulfill your query, due to an internal error in the internal error routine. --http://random.gimp.org --mailto:random () gimp org --UIN 23939474 On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Grzegorz Stelmaszek wrote:
Hi, At the beginning i'd like to excuse all of you if it is commonly well known (hmm, i guess it is, but noone patched it ;>. Both DoS`s use something known as portfuck (e.g. `while true; do telnet host port & done`). 1. If you use it against any inetd service, inetd will shoutdown that service for about 30 minutes (i did not checked, but it seems to be about that time). 2. If you use it against sshd, you have 99% that you crash the mashine in few seconds. TESTED: sshd-1.2.26 on Debian 2.0 sshd-1.2.27 on Debian 2.1 sshd-1.2.27 on RedHat 5.2 inetd - one provided with Debian 2.0/2.1/Redhat 5.2 all above platforms are VULNURABLE to this attack COMPROMISE: Allows any user to hang many machines in the Internet (i guess that only these behind a firewall are secure ;> SOLUTION: propaply running in ulimit envirmont (like qmail does) should help and additionally in inetd remove this strange 'protection'. regards, greg AKA VanitaS *************************************************************************** * Grzegorz Stelmaszek * For my public PGP key: * mailto:greg () tenet pl * finger:greg () tenet pl * http://www.tenet.pl * 18 E9 5E 6D 78 F0 11 F2 ****************************** 45 CF CF 63 77 C0 A4 20
Current thread:
- remote DoS against inetd and ssh Grzegorz Stelmaszek (Sep 02)
- Re: remote DoS against inetd and ssh Jedi/Sector One (Sep 08)
- Re: remote DoS against inetd and ssh Derek Callaway (Sep 08)
- Re: remote DoS against inetd and ssh Vincent Janelle (Sep 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: remote DoS against inetd and ssh Alexander Boutkhoudze (Sep 07)
- Re: remote DoS against inetd and ssh Jose Nazario (Sep 08)
- Re: remote DoS against inetd and ssh Stas Kisel (Sep 22)