Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code]
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:24:45 -0500 (CDT)
You might want to check: http://www.weblawresources.com/copyright_art.htm This block quote reproduced under the rights of "fair use:"
I'm sorry for the confusion, as I contradicted myself. A work may be protected without registering the copyright, but according to US Copyright law, you cannot pursue statutory damages unless you've taken the time to register. According to the URL you posted and the one I originally referenced at the Library of Congress both agree on this. In the event of an infringement against a copyright without registration, you are limited to only the actual damages you can prove you incurred. With exploit code, I'm assuming it would be hard to show true damage incurred upon the author, unless the author is selling said source code, which could possibly incur some liability of it's own if the code is being used to compromise systems.
From your own URL (http://www.weblawresources.com/copyright_art.htm):
"Why do I need to file a copyright application? You might be asking yourself, all right, so you say that copyrights do not require a formal copyright application. So why should I bother? The primary reason is your ability to leverage someone who has ripped off your site. If you have filed a copyright application within 90 days after first publication or prior to any infringement, you are eligible to elect statutory damages and receive attorney fees from the infringing party. If not, you will be limited to receiving your actual damages. Statutory damages can be awarded even if your actual damages are minimal. Statutory damages can run as high as $25,000.00 and $100,000.00 if the infringement was willful. When combined with an attorney fee award, this gives you strong ammunition against a potentially infringing party. But you need to make a timely copyright application in order to secure these rights." So, without registering the copyright, I would suspect an exploit code writer would have very little recourse in a court of law in the event his copyright is infringed upon. Regards, -- Joseph W. Shaw II Network Security Specialist/CCNA Unemployed. Will hack for food. God Bless. Apparently I'm overqualified but undereducated to be employed.
Current thread:
- hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Eric D. Williams (Jul 25)
- Re: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Stan Horwitz (Jul 26)
- Re: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Stanley G. Bubrouski (Jul 26)
- Re: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Timothy Lawless (Jul 26)
- 10 Big Myths about Copyright (especially as pertains to Internet Publication) Don Papp (Jul 26)
- Re: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Greg A. Woods (Jul 26)
- Re: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Joe Shaw (Jul 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Eric D. Williams (Jul 26)
- RE: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Greg A. Woods (Jul 26)
- RE: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Eric D. Williams (Jul 26)
- Re: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code] Joe Shaw (Jul 26)